Part of my research in the last decade has been on flexible unobserved components models for trend inflation. These models are useful for measuring trend inflation (and uncertainty), decomposing inflation into trend and transitory components, and producing density forecasts that can adapt to changing volatility.

Start here

For beginners, Section 6.1 of my teaching notes on unobserved components models provides a gentle introduction. The papers below then develop several extensions that address persistence in the inflation gap, bounded trend inflation, time-varying persistence, and additional information from slack or inflation expectations.

Recommended citations

If you use the models or code below, please cite the most relevant default reference(s) from the list below. Stock and Watson (2007) is the classic starting point for the UCSV model; my papers develop extensions and testing tools. The underlying precision-based state space simulation used across these UC models build on Chan and Jeliazkov (2009).

How these models are typically used

Univariate trend inflation models

The models below are univariate: they only require inflation data. They differ in their autocovariance structures and stochastic volatility specifications.

1. The unobserved components stochastic volatility (UCSV) model in Stock and Watson (2007) is the starting point for this literature. Chan (2018) considers a reparameterization of the classic UCSV model that makes it convenient to test whether stochastic volatility is needed in the trend component and/or the transitory component.

2. In the original UCSV model, the cyclical component is assumed to have no persistence. This can be restrictive, as the inflation gap is often autocorrelated. Chan (2013) introduces unobserved components models with stochastic volatility and moving-average errors. These models allow a persistent transitory component and can improve inflation forecasts relative to the original UCSV.

3. In many inflation targeting economies, trend inflation plausibly evolves within a narrow band (related to the inflation target), rather than following an unconstrained random walk. Motivated by this observation, Chan, Koop and Potter (2013) introduce a bounded trend inflation model with two features: (i) trend inflation is constrained to lie in an interval; and (ii) the persistence of the transitory component can vary over time.

Multivariate trend inflation models

Additional information can help to estimate trend inflation more precisely. The multivariate models below incorporate other sources of information related to inflation.

1. The Phillips curve relates the inflation gap to measures of economic slack. Chan, Koop and Potter (2016) propose a bivariate unobserved components model for inflation and unemployment with two features: (i) both trend inflation and the NAIRU evolve within bounds; and (ii) the Phillips curve slope and inflation persistence are allowed to vary over time.

2. Short-horizon inflation forecasts from professional forecasters are generally accurate and informative, but longer-horizon forecasts are more mixed. This raises the question of whether long-horizon expectations can still refine trend inflation estimates. Chan, Clark and Koop (2018) introduce a model of trend inflation that uses inflation data and long-run inflation expectations, while also allowing time-varying persistence in the transitory component and stochastic volatility.